Final Exit Ticket

Congratulations! You have completed your course on Affective Education. How quickly the time has passed. Each week there was something new to read, process, analyze and evaluate. Believe it or not, I was learning right along with you. How could I not? Considering that many of you provided such rich professional insight. I am a firm believer that it is always good to look at material, theories, and educational frameworks from different perspectives. For that, I thank you. Nonetheless, every course has its highlights; those moments whereby things simply stand-out and make a lot of sense, which leads to our final exit ticket. Please answer the following questions, what was the “ah ha moment for you”? And as a result, what new knowledge have you constructed through our eight week dialogue on Affective Education that strengthened your confidence about teaching moral education?

Albert Bandura

Albert Bandura
Bobo Doll Experiment

Video Link to the Bobo Doll Experiment

Review the video depicting Albert Bandura's Bobo Doll Experiment, which looks at aggression, observational and imitative learning. Share your opinion on how or why this experiment fits (or does not fit) into a discussion about affective education. Be sure to support your opinion. This counts as exit tickets for weeks 5 & 6. I look forward to reading your posts.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdh7MngntnI

The Stages of Moral Development

It has been noted that the Domain Theory was established in an attempt to "categorize behaviors into either a moral or social domain"(Freday, 2009), however prior classification systems, such as Kohlberg's theory of moral development, placed morality and social convention in the same developmental domain. Domain theory separates the two and goes on to highlight the differences in a child's development of each (Freday, 2009, para. 2). Do you agree or disagree? Post your views.

With that noted, click on the You Tube link provided. View the Kohlberg video that explores the stages of moral development and post your views and reations to the video in no less than a 100 words. You may use the book or any other reading from class to support your views. Just be inclined to cite your sources. I look forward to reading your post.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zY4etXWYS84

Friday, December 11, 2009

Kohlberg's Moral Development Theory Nneka Austin

Morality is a term that is easily confused with social convention. Both terms express how we treat others. However, the difference may sometime be used interchangeably because most social norms are based on moral views. So what are the differences? Morality is laws that are set in place to protect and serves human beings. On the other hand, Social convention is common laws that are created by societies. These laws are not universal; they are only practiced in certain social groups. What are acceptable in one society, maybe unacceptable in others? The confusion lays when social norms are based on morals. It is morally wrong to steal. The victim of the stealing would be treated unfairly and his things weren’t protect, which refers to morality issues. Stealing could also refer to social issues. In most societies stealing isn’t acceptable, but a few societies may accept stealing. For instinct, in the famous children’s book, “Peter Pan”, he stole from the rich and gave to the poor. Although Peter Pan was morally wrong, it was socially right due to the fact he gave the poor what they needed. Therefore, social norms could lead to immoral behavior, even if moral reasoning is present.

“The Heinz Dilemma” is a scenario that is similar to Peter Pan’s. Heinz’s wife was dying and didn’t have enough money to afford the drug to keep her alive. As a result, he stole the drug to keep his wife alive. This scenario was proposed to children and asked them should Heinz have done that. The children stated that it was wrong. As the same as other case studies with different theorists, this case study was in its favor. Children are taught not to steal at a very young age. Of course they would say that Heinz shouldn’t have stolen from the store. I wonder what would have happened if the children was left in the room by themselves, with their favorite sweets. They are told not to eat the sweets because it belongs to another group of kids. Would the children eat the sweets? Before I agree with Kohlberg’s moral development theory, I need to know that a child who knows moral reasoning would also behave morally. Until then, a lesson plan based on morals is a waste of time. The time could be spent on other subjects.

No comments:

Post a Comment